MINUTES OF THE MEETING ON 29 JANUARY OF THE UK ORGANISING COMMITTEE TO HOST THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL FORUM

 

The meeting was facilitated by Alex Gordon (RMT Regional Secretary,

South Wales & West of England) and Maureen O’Mara (President NATFHE). A

Proposed agenda had been circulated in advance, along with the minutes of the

Meeting of Saturday 24 January. Apologies were read out. The 55 people present

at the meeting introduced themselves.

 

1.                  Minutes of the meeting of 24 January 2004.

It was noted that the 24 January meeting had agreed that the UK Organising Committee should be

established to make all arrangements to host the ESF in London and that

all appropriate social movements, NGOs and organisations should be invited

to participate. It was agreed that the amendments suggested at the 24

January meeting to the UK ESF Organising Committee statement would be

considered at the next meeting of the Organising Committee. The mover of amendment 7,

clarified that the amendment was only the final para entitled “Add para

11” - please see the minutes of 24.1.04 meeting for the text of the

amendments.

 

2.                  Meeting to discuss proposals to ESF European preparatory meeting

It was agreed that the UK Organising Committee (UK ESF OC) would hold a

meeting during the day on Sunday 29 February to agree final proposals for

hosting the ESF in the UK to be put to the European preparatory meeting.

 

3.                  Agenda:

The agenda circulated prior to the meeting was agreed.

 

      4.   Working groups:

All of those who had contributed to the process to

date was thanked. It was agreed that written reports should be

circulated of the work of the working groups established between 13 December and 24

January. It was agreed that the UK ESF Org Cttee would establish all of the

Working groups necessary to develop the process in Britain and ensure

continuity with the work done so far. It was suggested that the formal establishment of

the working groups should be slightly delayed to allow organisations to

affiliate  to the committee and consider how they can most effectively contribute

to the process. In the meantime it was suggested organisations and groups of

organisations should take on the specific tasks necessary to develop

the UK proposal to host the ESF.

 

4.                  Venue:

There was a discussion on venues. It was generally felt that a single venue was preferable, but this and the problem that many are already booked limited the number of options. It was indicated that a provisional booking had  been made for Alexandra Palace to safeguard this option - but as time goes on less venues are available and those that are want firm

booking as soon as possible. It was agreed to continue looking at alternatives.

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.                  Translation:

It was agreed to seek to organisation translation on

the basis of volunteers and to work with Babel International to this end.

John Street (Babel Network UK) will work with other interested organisations

To take this forward.

 

 

7.                  Accommodation, catering and transport:

There was a long discussion

on the problem of providing sufficient cheap and free accommodation in

London, with contributions from many representatives of diverse community

organisations. It was agreed to continue to discuss with a range of

community and other organisations re accommodation, to make an appeal for

individuals to provide accommodation in their homes and to approach the London Tourist

Board re commercial hotels, guest houses etc. Representatives of Day-Mer and a

Kurdish community organisation indicated that there would be strong

Support  from local communities in providing catering. It was also suggested that

catering concessions might help contribute to funding. It was also

noted that discussions would be needed with Transport for London to assist on the

transport of delegates. The National Assembly Against Racism, Day-Mer,

Globalise Resistance and a number of other organisations agreed to look

Into developing solutions to these problems.

 

8.                  Website:

It was noted that the financial constraints on a UK hosting

of the ESF would make it very important that registration was efficient

and as far as possible carried out in advance. This in turn requires a well

functioning web-site able to cope securely with thousands of financial

transactions from registrations from all over Europe as well as the

development of the programme and organisation of the Forum. It was

agreed that the procurement process for a website would be started without delay

and that an email address would be set up immediately. It was suggested that the

ethical practices of the applicant companies are considered. Other issues

regarding distribution lists, netiquette, and content would be

discussed at a later stage.

 

9.      Budget/Fundraising/Bank account:

A first draft indication of possible costs of hosting the ESF in London was circulated for discussion. A robust plan demonstrating that the necessary funds to meet these costs could be

secured would be essential before binding commitments, such as booking

of venues could be entered into. This would include commitments of

contributions from supporting organisations, any contributions from appropriate trusts

acceptable to the ESF, a robust estimate of income from registration,

concessions and other sources. It was made clear that a number of large,

medium and smaller organisations are now considering what contribution

they may be able to commit to hosting the ESF. It was stated that at this

stage neither UNISON nor the GLA had made decisions to commit funds. Hannah

Griffiths (FoE) offered Friends of the Earth’s expertise in working with

others to investigate appropriate Trust fundraising.

It was suggested that funding should also be sought at grassroots level

and it was agreed to circulate an appeal to this end.

It was agreed that setting the right level of registration would be an

important issue to be resolved.

It was suggested that a solidarity fund should be established to assist

The participation of movements from Eastern Europe and SE Europe.

It was agreed that Maureen O’Mara (NATFHE) would proceed with opening a

Bank account and that suitable signatories with standing would be sought.

There will be a discussion with Brig Ougbridge (Big Green Gathering) and

others to take forward the work they have undertaken so far on legal

structures. Legal advice on this will be necessary.

 

10.       Expanding support

It was agreed that a large scale effort should now be made to

Systematically invite all appropriate organisations and social movements to support

Hosting the ESF in the UK and to participate in the UK Organising Committee. A

Number of approaches to this were suggested and Jeremy Dewar, Stuart Hodkinson

(Red Pepper), Naima Bouteldja (Just Peace) and Lucy Ellinson offered to

generate further support. The GLA will mail its stakeholder lists.

 

11.       Liaison with European Preparatory Meeting

 

11.               

The next European Preparatory Meeting was scheduled for 6/7 March. It Was agreed that the venue would be discussed at a later meeting.

 

12.       Office space

It was agreed that the UKOC should seek office space and it was

reported that discussions were taking place with a number of trade unions.

 

13.       Next meetings

It was agreed that the UK ESF OC will meet on Thursdays: 5, 12, 19 and

26 February at City Hall from 5:30 pm-8:30 pm and that there will be a

meeting during the day on Sunday 29 February to facilitate attendance from

outside London.

 

 

Correct record of minutes: Alex Gordon (RMT), 30th January, 2004